Analysis: Jim Jordan and company allege the Biden campaign got former intelligence officials to help suppress the story. The connection isn't so direct, though.
that Morell spearheaded. The statement suggested that the laptop story, published in the New York Post, might be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
The implication of the letter — which Jordan spelled out more explicitly Thursday night on Fox News — is that the Biden campaign was creating a pretext for suppressing the story, using the former intelligence officials. “Mr. Morell testified that Mr. Blinken did not hint that the Biden campaign ‘could use some help on this’ or suggest that Mr. Morell should ‘cook up something’ that the campaign should use,” the House Judiciary Democrats said.The Republicans’ claim of suppression also doesn’t really comport with the timeline, insofar as this is about social media suppression.
The other issue is the content of the statement. While the Jordan-Turner letter describes it as being “infamous,” the statement was more nuanced than it was initially described both in the media and by Joe Biden himself, asThe statement said that the situation “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,” while saying that it didn’t have direct evidence of that. It also allowed that the contents of the laptop could be genuine. But the Oct.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Former Trump Investigator Mark Pomerantz Must Appear for Jim Jordan CircusOn Wednesday, a judge ruled that Jim Jordan can question Mark Pomerantz, the former Manhattan special prosecutor who helmed a criminal investigation of Trump
Leer más »
Trump-appointed judge hands Jim Jordan a legal winManhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg had requested to block a subpoena by Jordan for the House Judiciary Committee's investigation of Bragg's office.
Leer más »
Federal judge rules Jim Jordan can subpoena ex-Manhattan prosecutor who investigated TrumpA federal judge ruled Wednesday that House Judiciary Committee Republicans can question a former Manhattan prosecutor about the criminal case against former President Trump, saying Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg does not have a legal basis to block the congressional subpoena.
Leer más »
Judge to rule in U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan’s probe of N.Y. prosecutorA federal judge weighing whether House Republicans can question a former prosecutor about the Manhattan criminal case against former President Donald Trump peppered lawyers on both sides with questions Wednesday, asking them to parse thorny issues of sovereignty, separation of powers and Congressional oversight arising from the historic indictment.
Leer más »
DOJ, Jim Jordan reach agreement after rift over video interviews of staffThe behind-the-scenes negotiations over videotaping witnesses have become a flash point in the weaponization subcommittee’s strategy.
Leer más »
Jim Jordan's crusade against Alvin Bragg hits another roadblockThe House Judiciary Committee led by Jim Jordan has been looking into Bragg's Trump investigation, stating that the probe was 'politically motivated.'
Leer más »