Trump’s lawyers argue that Twitter violated his free speech rights when it suspended him in January 2021, but federal judges expressed skepticism.
Donald Trump’s lawyers allege that the ban violated Trump’s freedom of speech under the First Amendment because Twitter was responding to government pressure. | Sean Rayford/Getty ImagesA federal appeals court panel sounded skeptical Wednesday about reviving former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit over being banned from Twitter two years ago.
“That’s a very, very small group of Congress,” Judge Mark Bennett said. “Why do statements from, let’s say, four senators at a committee hearing all of a sudden commit all of the power of the federal government to create state action here? … I don’t know of any case that stands for that proposition.”posted just once
During the arguments, Kozinski told Bennett that the ouster of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy this week illustrates how one doesn’t need a large number of lawmakers to have a major impact. In recent months, Kozinski and Trump’s other lawyers detected an opening for his Twitter lawsuit — and similar suits Trump has filed against other social media companies — through evidence obtained in a separate lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana. Those states claim that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment by intensely urging the platforms to remove certain content related to elections, Covid vaccines and other issues.
Bybee also repeatedly raised the possibility of the appeals panel leaving the appeal unresolved until the Supreme Court rules inabout the constitutionality of Florida and Texas laws aimed at preventing what critics call censorship by social media firms.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
A federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneursThe suit was brought by Edward Blum, the man behind the case against Harvard College that led to the Supreme Court dismantling affirmative action in higher education in June.
Leer más »
A federal appeals court blocks a grant program for Black female entrepreneursThe suit was brought by Edward Blum, the man behind the case against Harvard College that led to the Supreme Court dismantling affirmative action in higher education in June.
Leer más »
Appeals court limits cyber defense agency’s contacts with tech companiesThe 5th Circuit decision, which bars CISA from encouraging tech companies to remove posts, could have sweeping implications for government efforts to secure the 2024 vote.
Leer más »
| Appeals court takes aim at CISAThe Fifth Circuit reversed course, putting restrictions on CISA communications with social media platforms.
Leer más »
Appeals court sides with Brookside as drivers fight arrestsBrookside continues fighting to prosecute people arrested by the town’s troubled police force.
Leer más »
U.S. appeals court to hear arguments over hush-money settlement of Ronaldo rape caseA U.S. appeals court planned to hear from lawyers trying to revive a civil suit against Cristiano Ronaldo over an alleged rape in 2009.
Leer más »