Since the 2020 presidential election, Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch have been erecting the scaffolding for a decision that could transform election practices nationwide.
During oral arguments Wednesday in a North Carolina case, they reinforced their positions and appeared to find some support from fellow conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The question is whether the trio’s most radical view – effectively giving state legislatures control of elections, without oversight from state judges – would prevail.
North Carolina lawyer cites Thomas’ Second Amendment ruling Thomas, now age 74, has been the court’s most consistent conservative, particularly for an “originalist” approach to constitutional interpretation. Last session, he authored the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen decision, based on a historical reading of the Second Amendment. The court declared for the first time a right to carry a weapon outside of the home.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
The Debunked 'Independent State Legislature Theory' Is on the Supreme Court Docket—With Potentially Disastrous ConsequencesIn Moore v. Harper, being argued at the Supreme Court on Thursday, the justices will decide whether the North Carolina Supreme Court has the power to strike down the legislature’s illegally gerrymandered congressional map for violating the North Carolina Constitution.What's the case all about? Why did the Court take it in the first place? And what is the dubious 'independent state legislature theory'?
Leer más »
U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on a major NC elections caseThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments today in a high profile case out of North Carolina, where state Republicans argue that state legislatures — and only state legislatures — are in charge of federal elections. Here’s what to know.
Leer más »
Opinion | US Supreme Court Wants to Make America More Bigoted Again'The Supreme Court appears hell-bent on making America bigoted again. Step-by-step, they're undoing every bit of progressive legislation from the past 80 years that they can find.'
Leer más »
Listen Live: Supreme Court hears arguments in case that could upend federal election rulesThe case Moore v. Harper stems from North Carolina Republicans' redrawing of the state's congressional map after the 2020 Census.
Leer más »
‘You should die in a locked closet’: Dallas judge’s admonishment reversed by Supreme CourtThe state judicial ethics commission should not have reprimanded a Dallas judge who told a man convicted of brutally killing a child that he deserved to die...
Leer más »