Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court ruling

México Noticias Noticias

Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court ruling
México Últimas Noticias,México Titulares
  • 📰 Newsweek
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 57 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 52%

NAACP president Derrick Johnson welcomed the Supreme Court's decision as a 'triumph for our democracy.'

, both widely regarded as conservatives, voted with the court's three liberal members to deliver the result.

The ruling means the boundaries of Alabama's seven House districts will need to be redrawn ahead of the 2024 congressional elections, in a move that is expected to benefit the. It will also increase pressure on other Republican states to follow suit, strengthening the Democratic position in North Carolina and Louisiana.

U.S. Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy walks to the House Chambers to open up the legislative session in the U.S. Capitol Building on June 05, 2023 in Washington, DC. The House Republicans could lose a number of seats due to a Supreme Court ruling, according to a non-partisan analysis.The Cook Political Report, a non-partisan analytics website, updated its ratings for five House districts following the ruling.

Alabama's 1st and 2nd congressional districts, currently represented by Republicans Jerry Carl and Barry Moore respectively, have been changed from"solid Republican" to"toss up." The same has happened to Louisiana's 5th and 6th districts, putting seats currently held by Republicans Julia Letlow and Garret Graves, at risk to the Democrats.

Hemos resumido esta noticia para que puedas leerla rápidamente. Si estás interesado en la noticia, puedes leer el texto completo aquí. Leer más:

Newsweek /  🏆 468. in US

México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Supreme Court Rules Against Racist Gerrymandering in Alabama, Upholds Voting Rights ActSupreme Court Rules Against Racist Gerrymandering in Alabama, Upholds Voting Rights ActIn a decision that surprised legal experts, the Supreme Court ruled against congressional maps drawn in Alabama, asserting that they were the product of racist gerrymandering.
Leer más »

Supreme Court of Canada won't hear unvaccinated woman's case for organ donationSupreme Court of Canada won't hear unvaccinated woman's case for organ donationOTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear the appeal of an Alberta woman who was unwilling to be vaccinated against COVID\u002D19 in order to get a…
Leer más »

Supreme Court sides with Black voters, rules Alabama's congressional maps violate Voting Rights ActSupreme Court sides with Black voters, rules Alabama's congressional maps violate Voting Rights ActBlack voters had challenged the redrawing of the 2022 election maps.
Leer más »

Opinion: Why today's Supreme Court decision on voting rights is such a shockOpinion: The decision in Allen vs. Milligan is most significant for what the court didn’t do: It did not further weaken the law of voting rights as many expected.
Leer más »

Supreme Court rules in favor of Black voters in Alabama redistricting caseSupreme Court rules in favor of Black voters in Alabama redistricting caseASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a surprising 5-4 ruling in favor of Black voters in a congressional redistricting case,...
Leer más »

'Poop-themed' Jack Daniel's dog toy parody not protected by First Amendment, Supreme Court says'Poop-themed' Jack Daniel's dog toy parody not protected by First Amendment, Supreme Court saysThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled narrowly in favor of Jack Daniel's Products Inc. in a trademark infringement case concerning a dog toy parody.
Leer más »



Render Time: 2025-02-26 22:46:31