The case was dismissed due to statute of limitations
There’s been a lot of back and forth in the case since it was originally filed last August.
Elden originally claimed that the defendants “knowingly benefited and continue to benefit from their participation in Spencer’s commercial exploitation,” and that he was unable to give consent to use the photo , and his legal guardians also didn’t give consent.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Nirvana Beats Lawsuit Claiming ‘Nevermind’ Baby Cover Was Child PornA federal judge sided with Nirvana and dismissed a child pornography lawsuit filed by the man who appeared as a nude baby on the cover of the band’s 1991 album 'Nevermind'
Leer más »
Nirvana wins dismissal of 'Nevermind' naked baby's lawsuitThe lawsuit stemmed from Nirvana's use of a photo taken in 1991 at the Pasadena Aquatic Centre in California, which depicted the complainant swimming naked toward a dollar bill pierced with a fish hook.
Leer más »
Nirvana Wins 'Nevermind' Baby Lawsuit as Judge Dismisses Case for Final TimeU.S. District Court judge says Spencer Elden waited too long to file “child pornography” suit, effectively ending his suit over iconic cover image
Leer más »
Nirvana wins dismissal of 'Nevermind' naked baby's lawsuitNirvana has won the dismissal of a lawsuit by a man who claimed his depiction as a naked four-month-old baby on the cover of the band's seminal 1991 album 'Nevermind' was child pornography.
Leer más »