Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal court

México Noticias Noticias

Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal court
México Últimas Noticias,México Titulares
  • 📰 HoustonChron
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 51%

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...

Anna Moneymaker, Staff / Getty Imageson why a series of lawsuits claiming they should be held liable for damages caused by climate change should be moved to federal court.

"This case is not about changing national climate policy — it’s about accountability for the climate harms in Colorado that companies like Exxon and Suncor are responsible for,” he said in a statement.As is custom, the Supreme Court did not explain why they would not hear the cases. The court did say Justice Samuel Alito had recused himself on two of the five climate cases in which requests for hearings been filed with the court.

The decision marks another setback for oil companies, setting them up for the prospect of defending themselves in multiple jurisdictions against claims that could add up to tens of billions of dollars. It follows a decision by the Biden administration last month rejecting oil companies’ argument the state and local cases should be heard in federal court.

Acting on a request for input from the Supreme Court, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote, “the United States has reexamined its position and has concluded that state-law claims like those pleaded here should not be recharacterized as claims arising under federal common law.”

Hemos resumido esta noticia para que puedas leerla rápidamente. Si estás interesado en la noticia, puedes leer el texto completo aquí. Leer más:

HoustonChron /  🏆 609. in US

México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Supreme Court justices ‘at each other’s throats’ as abortion pill access upheld legal expert saysSupreme Court justices ‘at each other’s throats’ as abortion pill access upheld legal expert saysThe Supreme Court blocked in full a decision by Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk made on April 7 that invalidated the Food and Drug Administration’s longtime approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito publicly dissented from the decision. Joy Reid and her panel discuss.
Leer más »

Supreme Court Rules to Protect Access to the Abortion Pill — For NowSupreme Court Rules to Protect Access to the Abortion Pill — For NowThe court’s ruling means mifepristone will continue to be legal as the case makes its way through the courts.
Leer más »

The Supreme Court fight over an abortion pill: What’s next?The Supreme Court fight over an abortion pill: What’s next?Nothing will change for now. That’s what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill.
Leer más »

What’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s orderWhat’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s orderNothing will change for now. That’s what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill. A court case that began in Texas has sought to roll back Food and D…
Leer más »

What’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s actionWhat’s next for abortion pill after Supreme Court’s actionHere's a look at the abortion drug at issue, how the case got to the nation’s highest court and what’s next in the legal process.
Leer más »

What comes next after the Supreme Court blocked — for now — restrictions on abortion pillsWhat comes next after the Supreme Court blocked — for now — restrictions on abortion pillsHere's what to know about the Supreme Court's move.
Leer más »



Render Time: 2025-02-26 14:55:39