Race-based affirmative action programs violate the Constitution’s guarantees of equal treatment, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a pair of monumental decisions striking down the policies used by major colleges and universities to try to add more Black and Hispanic students to their ranks.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing the key opinion for the 6-3 ruling, said students must be treated on the basis of their “experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race.”
“Many universities have for too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice,” he wrote.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Supreme Court outlaws consideration of race as a factor in college admissionsJUST IN | The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that colleges and universities must stop considering race in admissions, forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.
Leer más »
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Leer más »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Leer más »
Supreme Court Upholds State Courts’ Power to Prevent GerrymandersThe Supreme Court said legislatures drawing congressional districts are bound by election protections in state constitutions, dealing a blow to GOP aspirations to sideline state courts from overseeing federal elections
Leer más »
Supreme Court rejects theory that would have meant radical changes to election rulesThe Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the theory that state legislatures have almost unlimited power to decide the rules for federal elections and draw partisan congressional maps without interference from state courts.
Leer más »
Supreme Court rules state courts can play role in policing federal electionsBREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that North Carolina’s top court did not overstep its bounds in striking down a congressional districting plan. The case would have left state legislatures virtually unchecked in making rules for federal elections.
Leer más »