Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post

México Noticias Noticias

Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post
México Últimas Noticias,México Titulares
  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 72%

The Supreme Court declined to address the legal liability shield that protects tech platforms from being held responsible for their users’ posts, the court said in an unsigned opinion.

The court's decisions in these cases will serve as a big sigh of relief for tech platforms for now, but many members of Congress are still itching to reform the legal liability shield.

"As alleged by plaintiffs, defendants designed virtual platforms and knowingly failed to do 'enough' to remove ISIS-affiliated users and ISIS related content—out of hundreds of millions of users worldwide and an immense ocean of content—from their platforms," Thomas wrote in the court's unanimous opinion.

Many lawmakers see Section 230 as an unnecessary protection for a massive industry, though its proponents say the law also protects smaller players from costly lawsuits, since it helps to dismiss cases about users' speech at an earlier stage. Still, lawmakers remain divided on the form such changes should take, meaning there are still massive hurdles to getting it done.

Hemos resumido esta noticia para que puedas leerla rápidamente. Si estás interesado en la noticia, puedes leer el texto completo aquí. Leer más:

CNBC /  🏆 12. in US

México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by a government agency more than two decades ago
Leer más »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by a government agency more than two decades ago.
Leer más »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAt issue are the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristone in 2000, and FDA actions making the drug more accessible in later years.
Leer más »

Mifepristone abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtMifepristone abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in New Orleans hears arguments Wednesday on whether a drug used in the most common method of abortion was properly approved by the FDA in 2000.
Leer más »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAt issue are the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristone in 2000, and FDA actions making the drug more accessible in later years.
Leer más »

Abortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtAbortion pill case moves to appeals court, on track for Supreme CourtLegal arguments over women’s access to a drug used in the most common method of abortion move to a federal appeals court in New Orleans on Wednesday, in a case challenging a Food and Drug Administration decision made more than two decades ago
Leer más »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 13:10:45