The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear appeals from President Donald Trump in three separate cases seeking access to his personal financial records, including tax returns, personal checks and credit card transactions. Three congressional committees and a New York prosecutor each issued subpoenas
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear appeals from President Donald Trump in three separate cases seeking access to his personal financial records, including tax returns, personal checks and credit card transactions.
The Manhattan District Attorney seeks many of the same records as part of a criminal probe into possible violations of state financial laws. Legal scholars have cautioned that the decision to hear the cases does not necessarily suggest the justices will side with the president. "I think if you look at the Court’s precedents, you know, the president’s argument is a tough one," he said."Maybe 'an uphill one' would be the right way to describe it."
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
U.S. Supreme Court takes up Trump bid to shield financial recordsThe Supreme Court agreed to hear President Trump’s appeals in three separate cases to prevent his financial records, including tax returns, from being handed over to the House of Representatives committees and a New York prosecutor
Leer más »
Supreme Court to rule on release of Trump tax recordsUS Supreme Court agrees Friday to consider President Trump's appeal of lower court orders, now on hold, that require his banks and accountants to turn over financial records to the US House and local prosecutors in New York.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to hear all 3 Trump subpoena challenges linked to personal financesSupreme Court agrees to hear Pres. Trump’s appeal in three separate cases challenging subpoenas for his personal financial records.
Leer más »
The Supreme Court just jumped into the political deep end with Trump taxes lawsuitThe eventual decisions would help define the high court in the Trump era, especially as Chief Justice John Roberts has tried to carefully navigate Trump-related litigation and regularly declares that the justices are above politics.
Leer más »
The Supreme Court Just Let Kentucky's Anti-Abortion Law Stand'The Kentucky law is clearly designed to make it harder to access abortion—once again putting anti-abortion politics ahead of pregnant people’s reproductive health and rights.' From BlackWomensRJ:
Leer más »
American Samoans to gain U.S. citizenship, federal court rulesUntil now, American Samoas were deemed 'non-citizen nationals,' and therefore denied the right to vote, run for office, work in certain jobs, sponsor family members for immigration and get federal aid for school.
Leer más »