The Supreme Court on Monday decided to take up a case by South Carolina Republicans to preserve a congressional district after a lower court found it had been racially gerrymandered.
South Carolina Senate President Thomas Alexander, a Republican, is challenging a January lower court ruling that found one of the state's seven recently drawn districts was put together in a way that weakened the power of Democratic-leaning black voters. That district, which covers Charleston County, is represented by Rep. Nancy Mace .
"The Enacted Plan intentionally discriminates against thousands of black Charlestonians, attempting to dilute their voting power by 'bleaching' them out of CD1 and unnecessarily separating them from their neighbors based on their race," according to a motion to affirm filed to the high court in March by the NAACP.
“I hope the court does what's best for the people of South Carolina's coast,” Mace told the Washington Examiner in response to the Supreme Court's notice to hear the case.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Supreme Court to review South Carolina congressional map for discrimination against Black votersThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether South Carolina’s congressional districts need to be redrawn because they discriminate against Black voters
Leer más »
Supreme Court to review South Carolina racial gerrymander claimThe Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a bid by South Carolina Republicans to restore a congressional district that a lower court ruled a racial gerrymander.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to hear racial redistricting case from South CarolinaA lower court found that Rep. Nancy Mace’s district was an illegal racial gerrymander.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to review South Carolina congressional map for discrimination against Black votersThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether South Carolina's congressional districts need to be redrawn because they discriminate against Black voters. The justices said Monday they would review a lower-court ruling that found a coastal district running from Charleston to Hilton Head was intentionally redrawn to reduce the number of Democratic-leaning Black voters and to make it more likely Republican candidates would win. The case probably will be argued in the fall, and decided in the run up to the 2024 elections, when all the seats in the closely divided House of Representatives, now under Republican control, will be on the ballot.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to review South Carolina congressional map for discrimination against Black votersThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether South Carolina’s congressional districts need to be redrawn because they discriminate against Black voters. The justices said Monday they would review a lower-court ruling that found a coastal district running from Charleston to Hilton Head was intentionally redrawn to reduce the number of Black Democratic-leaning voters to make it more likely Republican candidates would win. The case probably will be argued in the fall, and decided in the run up to the 2024 elections, when all the seats in the closely divided House of Representatives, now under Republican control, will be on the ballot.
Leer más »