The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case pertaining to whether states can remove Donald Trump from ballots for violating the 14th Amendment.
Anti-Trump demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court considers whether Donald Trump is eligible to run for president in the 2024 election in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 8.heard arguments on Thursday in the case over whether states can toss Donald Trump off their ballots. Much of the discussion centered around a wildly inane legal question: whether America’s president qualifies as “an officer of the United States.
On the other hand, the justices did not all appear to buy one of Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell’s primary arguments — that the president is exempt from the 14th Amendment’s definition of “officers” of the United States. “President Trump is not covered by Section 3 because the president is not an officer of the United States,” Mitchell said, adding that there are “officers who don’t hold offices.
The conservative judges, however, pushed back strongly against Murray. In his questioning, Roberts seemed wholly unconvinced that the 14th Amendment allowed states to disqualify a candidate on the basis of insurrection, describing the argument as “a position that is at war with the whole thrust of the 14th Amendment.”
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Supreme Court Sides with Biden Administration in Dispute with Texas over Razor WireThe Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Biden administration in its dispute with Texas over razor wire along the Rio Grande. The court cleared the way for Border Patrol to cut through the wire, which the administration says endangers migrants.
Leer más »
Jussie Smollett asks Illinois Supreme Court to hear caseThe former “Empire” actor who was convicted of falsely reporting a hate crime to Chicago police in January of 2019 is petitioning the Illinois Supreme Court to hear his case.
Leer más »
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in lawsuit challenging public money to private schoolsThe Supreme Court heard arguments challenging the constitutionality of lawmakers spending $10 million in public funds on private schools.
Leer más »
In case over Trump's ballot eligibility, concerned voters make their own pitches to Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court's case over former President Donald Trump's ballot eligibility has attracted more than a dozen filings from voters who have felt compelled to express their views.
Leer más »
New Alaska Supreme Court chief justice highlights improvements in first annual addressMaassen listed initiatives from the past year that he said improved the court system’s accessibility and efficiency, like remote hearings.
Leer más »
Florida Asks State Supreme Court To Tank Abortion Ballot ProposalSara Boboltz is a reporter for HuffPost based in New York City. She can be reached at sara.boboltzhuffingtonpost.com.
Leer más »