The justices largely focused on the impact of disqualification nationwide.
in the historic case Trump v. Anderson, each of the court's nine justices expressed skepticism that an individual state has the authority to deny a candidate for federal office from the ballot as an "insurrectionist."“Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens, but for the rest of the nation?” said Justice Elena Kagan.
Only Congress, it adds, can remove the disqualification by two-thirds vote of both the House and Senate. It does not spell out who gets to decide when someone has "engaged in insurrection" or how. The nation's highest court has never before examined the issue. Anti-Trump demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court considers whether former President Donald Trump is eligible to run for president in the 2024 election, Feb, 8, 2024, in Washington.While the counsel for Colorado voters challenging Trump's eligibility repeatedly raised details of the former president's efforts to overturn results of the 2020, the justices largely refrained from engaging with those facts or the merits of the Colorado ruling.
"The question of who can enforce Section 3, with respect to a presidential candidate -- the consequences of what the Colorado Supreme Court did, as some people claim, would be quite severe,” Justice Samuel Alito said.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Today’s Rental was chosen for the windows and private rooftop, obviouslyThis rental is located at 2303 14th St NW. The Craigslist ad says: '$4296 / 2br - 1450ft2 - 2B2B&Den 14th St Penthouse w/beautiful outdoor terrace, monument views (14th St. / Cardozo) Penthouse apartment coming available March 18th at 2303 14th St NW.
Leer más »
The Very Dumb Question at the Center of Trump’s Supreme Court Ballot CaseThe Supreme Court heard arguments in a case pertaining to whether states can remove Donald Trump from ballots for violating the 14th Amendment.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to Address Trump's Presidential EligibilityThe Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding Donald Trump's presidential eligibility, with a focus on the argument that the president isn't an 'officer of the United States' subject to disqualification under the 14th Amendment. Trump's lawyers argue that the disqualification clause doesn't cover presidents, creating a potential exception for Trump.
Leer más »
The Supreme Court Weighs In On Trump Being Removed From The BallotWhen it comes to whether or not Trump should appear on presidential ballots, there are at least two questions to consider. The first is legal — does the 14th amendment apply him? The second is practical.
Leer más »
Supreme Court hears Trump ballot oral argumentsThe U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Thursday, Feb. 8, 2024 on whether former President Donald Trump should be removed from Colorado's primary ballot under the 14th Amendment for 'insurrection' by inciting the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
Leer más »
Supreme Court considers whether Trump can be removed from a primary ballotJustices are reviewing Colorado's disqualification of Donald Trump from its state primary ballot because he allegedly engaged in an insurrection.
Leer más »