The Supreme Court will decide whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts.
Now, the court has agreed to hear two cases involving much lower-profile figures. The first involves two elected members of a California school board, the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees. The members, Michelle O'Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane, used Facebook and Twitter accounts to communicate with the public. Two parents, Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, left critical comments and replies to posts on the board members' accounts and were blocked.
Katie Fallow, senior counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which was involved in the Trump case, said that more and more public officials are using social media to communicate about official business. “As many courts have held, it doesn’t matter whether it’s the president or a local city manager, government officials can’t block people from these forums simply because they don’t like what they’re saying," Fallow said in a statement. “The Supreme Court should reaffirm that basic First Amendment principle.”
The Supreme Court will not hear the new cases before the fall. The justices this week are hearing their last scheduled arguments and will issue decisions in May and June before going on a summer break. The court will resume hearing arguments in October.Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
México Últimas Noticias, México Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Supreme court declines oil companies' request to shift climate suits to federal courtThe U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear arguments from oil companies on why a...
Leer más »
Supreme Court takes social media cases with echoes of TrumpThe court said Monday it will decide two new cases, involving elected members of a California school board and a Michigan city manager.
Leer más »
Supreme Court takes social media cases with echoes of TrumpThe Supreme Court will decide whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts. It's an issue that previously came up in a case involving former President Donald Trump. Two years ago the Supreme Court dismissed a case over Trump’s efforts to block critics from his personal Twitter account. The court said there was nothing left to the case after Trump was permanently suspended from Twitter and ended his presidential term. The Republican ex-president’s account has since been reinstated. The court said Monday it will decide two new cases, involving elected members of a California school board and a Michigan city manager.
Leer más »
Supreme Court takes up legal spat over public officials blocking people on social mediaThe Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether people can sue public officials who block them on social media
Leer más »
U.S. Supreme Court to decide if public officials can block critics on social mediaThe U.S. Supreme Court, exploring free speech rights in the social media era, on Monday agreed to consider whether the Constitution's First Amendment bars government officials from blocking their critics on platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
Leer más »
Supreme Court to hear cases on government officials blocking critics on social mediaThe Supreme Court said Monday it will hear two cases in which public officials blocked critics on their personal social media accounts.
Leer más »